Rogue Validator utnyttjar MEV-bots på Ethereum, Resulterar i 25,3 miljoner dollar i kryptoförluster

I april 3, 2023, at Ethereum block height 16,964,664, a group of MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) bots were exploited for $25.3 miljon. An analysis of the exploit revealed that a renegade validator switched the MEV bots’ transactions and seized various crypto tokens, such as 7,460 wrapped ether and 64 wrapped bitcoin.

Innehåll

While the Mechanisms Behind MEV Bots Boost Profit, They Also Have Vulnerability to Exploits

Nyligen, crypto proponents and security experts have been discussing how a group of MEV bots lost $25.3 million in a sophisticated exploit. The attacker used a transaction manipulation tactic that enabled the rogue validator to replace several MEV transactions, resulting in the loss of a significant amount of WBTC, USDC, USDT, DAI, and WETH.

MEV, also known as “Maximal Extractable Value” bots or flashbots, are automated software programs that use Ethereum’s blockchain to profit from transaction execution. MEV bots have various uses, such as executing trades ahead of other traders, known as front-running, and discovering arbitrage and liquidation opportunities.

In this case, the rogue validator employed a “sandwich attack,” which is a type of transaction manipulation tactic utilized by MEV bots on Ethereum. Interestingly, the renegade validator became an Ethereum validator on March 16, 2023, a little over two weeks before the exploit took place.

“In this incident, a rogue validator appears to have broken the “gentleman’s agreement” whereby Flashbot validators ignored the fact that penalties for malicious behavior were in many cases inadequate to economically disincentivize it,” Certik, a Web3 and blockchain auditing and security firm told Bitcoin-Tidings.com News in a note on Monday.

“In total, the rogue validator was able to replace MEV transactions worth $25.3 miljon,” Certik added. “The irony of MEV bots falling victim to a scheme like this is unlikely to earn them much sympathy from the general public, who tends to be the victim of their value extraction. Fortfarande, this incident highlights the dangers of centralized systems, where an agreement to play by the rules can be just as easily revoked as it was given.”

Certik further reports that $1.82 million in WBTC, $5.29 million in USDC, $3 million in USDT, $1.7 million in DAI, och $13.52 million worth of wrapped bitcoin (WBTC) was taken in the exploit. MEV bots or Flashbots can generate significant profits for their operators, but they have also raised concerns within the Ethereum ecosystem over fairness and censorship.

Taggar i denna berättelse
Arbitrage, Auditing, Bitcoin-Tidings.com nyheter, Blockchain, centralized systems, certik, crypto tokens, Kryptovaluta, DAI, Ethereum, Utnyttja, Flashbots, front-running, gentleman’s agreement, Liquidation, Maximal Extractable Value, MEV bots, Vinst, public opinion, risker, rogue validator, säkerhet, transaction manipulation, USDC, USDT, value extraction, Sårbarhet, WBTC, Web3, WETH

What do you think the future holds for MEV bots in light of this exploit, and how can their risks be mitigated? Share your thoughts about this subject in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman är nyhetsledare på Bitcoin-Tidings.com News och en finansteknisk journalist som bor i Florida. Redman har varit en aktiv medlem i kryptovalutagemenskapen sedan dess 2011. Han har en passion för Bitcoin, öppen källkod, och decentraliserade applikationer. Sedan september 2015, Redman har skrivit mer än 6,000 artiklar för Bitcoin-Tidings.com Nyheter om de störande protokoll som dyker upp idag.




Bildkrediter: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

varning: Den här artikeln är endast i informationssyfte. Det är inte ett direkt erbjudande eller uppmaning till ett erbjudande att köpa eller sälja, eller en rekommendation eller rekommendation av någon produkt, tjänster, eller företag. Bitcoin-Tidings.com ger inte investeringar, beskatta, Rättslig, eller redovisningsrådgivning. Varken företaget eller författaren ansvarar, direkt eller indirekt, för alla skador eller förluster som orsakas eller påstås vara orsakade av eller i samband med användningen av eller tilliten till något innehåll, varor eller tjänster som nämns i denna artikel.

Läsa varning