Stöd för Ripple Grows i SEC-process över XRP - VD säger "Det är aldrig tidigare skådat"

Stöd för Ripple Labs i dess kamp mot U.S.A. säkerhet och utbytesprovision (SEC) över xrp har vuxit, med 12 amicus trosor inlagda. “It’s unprecedented,” Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said, adding that each brief explains in its own unique way “the irreparable harm the SEC will do to every facet of the U.S. crypto economy if it gets its way.”

Innehåll

12 Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of Ripple

A growing number of amicus briefs have been filed in support of Ripple Labs as the company continues to fight the U.S. säkerhet och utbytesprovision (SEC) lawsuit over the sale of XRP. Twelve amicus briefs have been filed on behalf of Ripple so far, including one by the Nasdaq-listed cryptocurrency exchange Myntbas, which was among the first trading platforms to delist XRP following the SEC’s lawsuit.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse tweeted Friday:

For those of you keeping count, 12 amici briefs submitted. It’s unprecedented (I’m told) to have this happen at this stage. They each explain — in their own unique way — the irreparable harm the SEC will do to every facet of the U.S. crypto economy if it gets its way.

Besides Coinbase, other individuals, företag, and organizations that have filed amicus briefs on behalf of Ripple are ICAN, I-Remit, Tapjets, Spendthebits, Blockchain Association, John E. Deaton, Crypto Council for Innovation, Valhil Capital, Chamber of Digital Commerce, Cryptillian Payment Systems, and Veri Dao LLC.

With the growing number of amicus briefs filed on behalf of Ripple, the SEC asked the court for more time to reply to them. På fredag, the court granted the agency’s motion to extend the time for all parties to file and reply to amicus briefs. The deadline for filing amicus briefs is now Nov. 11 and replies must be filed by Nov. 30.

Commenting on the SEC seeking more time to reply to all the amicus briefs filed, Stuart Alderoty, general counsel for Ripple, tweeted Thursday:

A dozen independent voices — companies, developers, utbyten, public interest and trade associations, retail holders — all filing in SEC v Ripple to explain how dangerously wrong the SEC is. The SEC’s response? We need more time, not to listen or engage, but to blindly bulldoze on.

The securities regulator sued Ripple, its CEO, and co-founder Chris Larsen in December 2020 over the sale of XRP, alleging that the crypto token is a security.

Garlinghouse said last month that he expects an answer in the first half of 2023, noting that Ripple would consider a settlement with the securities watchdog if the regulator states that XRP is not a security. The executive stressed that the XRP case is not just about Ripple but the whole crypto industry.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has said on several occasions that while bitcoin is a commodity, most other crypto tokens are securities. i alla fall, the SEC has been criticized for taking an enforcement-centric approach to regulating the crypto industry. För övrigt, four U.S. lawmakers sent a letter to Gensler this week accusing him of “hypocritical mismanagement” of the SEC and refusing to “practice what he preaches.”

Taggar i denna berättelse
amicus trosor, Brad Garlinghouse, Myntbas, domstol SEC, Krusning, Ripple Labs, SEC, sek rättegång över xrp, sek xrp, stöd för Ripple, XRP, xrp säkerhet

Do you think the SEC or Ripple Labs will win this case? Do you think the SEC will declare that XRP is not a security? Låt oss veta i kommentarsfältet nedan.

Kevin Helms

Student i österrikisk ekonomi, Kevin hittade Bitcoin i 2011 och har varit evangelist sedan dess. Hans intressen ligger i Bitcoin säkerhet, system med öppen källkod, nätverkseffekter och skärningspunkten mellan ekonomi och kryptografi.




Bildkrediter: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

varning: Den här artikeln är endast i informationssyfte. Det är inte ett direkt erbjudande eller uppmaning till ett erbjudande att köpa eller sälja, eller en rekommendation eller rekommendation av någon produkt, tjänster, eller företag. Bitcoin-Tidings.com ger inte investeringar, beskatta, Rättslig, eller redovisningsrådgivning. Varken företaget eller författaren ansvarar, direkt eller indirekt, för alla skador eller förluster som orsakas eller påstås vara orsakade av eller i samband med användningen av eller tilliten till något innehåll, varor eller tjänster som nämns i denna artikel.

Läsa varning