Apecoin Community röstar om att behålla APE-token i Ethereum-ekosystemet

Apecoin-gemenskapen är mitt uppe i att diskutera huruvida kryptotillgången ska förbli inom Ethereums ekosystem.. Medan AIP-41-röstningen började idag, the proposal’s voting process will end on June 8, 2022, på 9 kl. (ET). Under tiden, the project’s native token APE has lost 57% mot U.S.A. dollar in the last 30 dagar.

Innehåll

Apecoin Community Begins Voting on Whether or Not Asset Should Remain Operating on Ethereum

This week the Apecoin community is voting on whether or not the native token apecoin (APA) should remain on the Ethereum blockchain. The voting process was meddelat by the official Apecoin Twitter account in order to update the community. “The proposal up for a vote is AIP-41 which proposes ApeCoin to stay within the Ethereum ecosystem,” the tweet explains. “Voting ends next Wednesday, June 8th at 9PM ET, so be sure to vote before then.” The tweet also links the Apecoin Improvement Proposal (AIP) 41, which summarizes the debate.

The summary cites the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) creators Yuga Labs when the company stated in a tweet that APE needed to migrate to another blockchain. “It seems abundantly clear that apecoin will need to migrate to its own chain in order to properly scale,” the company said on April 30. According to AIP-41, the Apecoin DAO believes “ApeCoin should remain within the Ethereum ecosystem, and not migrate elsewhere to an L1 chain or sidechain not secured by Ethereum.” The Apecoin DAO further states:

Migrating to a different chain is a costly, risky, and complex endeavor with many moving parts that may, if not thoughtfully considered, result in catastrophic loss, or at worst, abandonment by Yuga Labs and other entities that would otherwise meaningfully to Apecoin.

For now, much of the discussion goes both ways, as some people agree with the Apecoin DAO’s opinions and others do not. Some individuals mentioned scaling solutions like Arbitrum One, Zksync, Optimism, and Immutable X. Others can envision APE migrating to another chain like Avalanche. One person commented and said: “Moving away from ethereum is really the worst decision they can make.” In recent times, Ethereum fees have dropped a great deal, to under $3 per transfer, but they are starting to rise again this week as the average gas fee is 0.0056 ETH eller $9.87 per transfer.

The cost to move an ERC20 asset like apecoin (APA) can be more costly than a simple ether transfer. Apecoin’s value has dropped a great deal as the crypto asset is down 77.3% from its April 28 all-time high tapping $26.70 per APE. During the past month, APE is down 57% and seven-day statistics indicate apecoin has dropped 4.9% i värde. APE has an overall market capitalization of around $1.77 miljarder idag, and apecoin has seen $252 million in 24-hour global trade volume.

Taggar i denna berättelse
AIP-41, Altcoins, APA, APE all-time high, APE Markets, Apecoin, Apecoin DAO, Beslut ett, Lavin, ERC20, Ethereum, Styrningsförslag, Oföränderligt X, Nätverksavgifter, Optimism, förslag, Skalning, Röstning, Zksync

What do you think about the apecoin (APA) migration discussion? Låt oss veta vad du tycker om detta ämne i kommentarsfältet nedan.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman är nyhetsledare på Bitcoin-Tidings.com News och en finansteknisk journalist som bor i Florida. Redman har varit en aktiv medlem i kryptovalutagemenskapen sedan dess 2011. Han har en passion för Bitcoin, öppen källkod, och decentraliserade applikationer. Sedan september 2015, Redman har skrivit mer än 5,000 artiklar för Bitcoin-Tidings.com Nyheter om de störande protokoll som dyker upp idag.




Bildkrediter: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

varning: Den här artikeln är endast i informationssyfte. Det är inte ett direkt erbjudande eller uppmaning till ett erbjudande att köpa eller sälja, eller en rekommendation eller rekommendation av någon produkt, tjänster, eller företag. Bitcoin-Tidings.com ger inte investeringar, beskatta, Rättslig, eller redovisningsrådgivning. Varken företaget eller författaren ansvarar, direkt eller indirekt, för alla skador eller förluster som orsakas eller påstås vara orsakade av eller i samband med användningen av eller tilliten till något innehåll, varor eller tjänster som nämns i denna artikel.

Läsa varning