‘Fiat Is Fragile’ — Silicon Valley Bank’s Collapse Sparks Finger-Pointing and Concerns of Contagion

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) has become the center of attention after its collapse prompted the U.S. Zvezna korporacija za zavarovanje depozitov (FDIC) to shut the bank down on Friday. It was the largest U.S. bank failure since 2008, and various alleged catalysts have been pointed to. Some believe venture capitalists caused a bank run, while others blame the U.S. Federal Reserve’s rate hikes. Economist and gold bug Peter Schiff said on Friday that the U.S. banking system would experience more trouble ahead. He and several speculators believe that these financial institutions hold mountains of long-term treasuries.

Vsebina

Calls for SVB Intervention as Market Observers Predict Larger Financial Collapse in the U.S.

Over the past week, two U.S. banking institutions, banka Silvergate in Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) failed. SVB’s kolaps was the largest banking failure since Washington Mutual (Skupaj) v 2008, which was blamed on expanding branches too quickly and holding massive amounts of subprime mortgages lent to so-called unqualified buyers.

Before its collapse, Wamu held $188.3 billion in deposits, while SVB is estimated to have lost around $175.4 billion in deposits. Vendar, while SVB’s deposits at the end of December 2022 were $175.4 milijarde, customers attempted to remove $42 milijarde on Thursday alone. It’s safe to say that SVB’s demise was a lot faster than Wamu’s collapse at the end of 2008.

‘Fiat Is Fragile’ — Silicon Valley Bank's Collapse Sparks Finger-Pointing and Concerns of Contagion

Just days before its collapse, SVB attempted to strengthen its balance sheet by announcing the need to raise $2.25 milijarde. The bank also sold its available-for-sale (AFS) obvezniški portfelj za $21 milijarde, resulting in a $1.8 billion loss from the sale. SVB is well-known for banking tech startups and venture capital (VC) denar, and some market observers believe that these clients caused a bank run.

“This was a hysteria-induced bank run caused by VCs,” rekel Ryan Falvey, a fintech investor at Restive Ventures, in an interview with CNBC on Friday. “This is going to be remembered as one of the ultimate cases of an industry cutting off its nose to spite its face,« je dodal.

‘Fiat Is Fragile’ — Silicon Valley Bank's Collapse Sparks Finger-Pointing and Concerns of Contagion

Other analysts and market observers are blaming the illogical inverted yield curve that long and short-term Treasuries are facing today, as well as the U.S. Državne rezerve zvišanja tečajev. Soona Amhaz, founder and managing partner at Volt Capital, rekel: “The open secret is that technically most U.S. banks are bankrupt right now, as they’re all sitting on long-duration treasuries that are underwater in a 4% interest rate environment.”

Economist and gold bug Peter Schiff shares a similar view to Amhaz, expecting a much larger financial collapse in the United States. “The U.S. banking system is on the verge of a much bigger collapse than 2008. Banks own long-term paper at extremely low-interest rates,” Schiff navedeno. Nadaljeval je:

They can’t compete with short-term Treasuries. Mass withdrawals from depositors seeking higher yields will result in a wave of bank failures.

Craft Ventures executive David Sacks took to Twitter, calling on Powell to intervene and prevent a possible contagion. “Where is Powell? Where is Yellen? Stop this crisis NOW,” Sacks tvitnil. “Announce that all depositors will be safe. Place SVB with a Top 4 bank. Do this before Monday’s opening, or there will be contagion and the crisis will spread.”

‘Fiat Is Fragile’ — Silicon Valley Bank's Collapse Sparks Finger-Pointing and Concerns of Contagion

Billionaire and Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz also weighed in, expressing surprise that the Fed would let depositors lose money in Silicon Valley Bank. “Are all banks going to be treated like hedge funds? Seems like a policy mistake,” Novogratz navedeno. Shapeshift founder Erik Voorhees ridiculed the call for Fed intervention on Twitter, navaja, “Fiat is fragile.”

SVB’s issues have impacted the crypto economy, particularly the stablecoin economy backed by fiat reserves. Circle razkrito that it had $3.3 billion of cash supporting usd coin (USDC) trapped in the bank, causing USDC to unpeg from the U.S. dollar parity. As of 10:30 zjutraj. marca 11, 2023, USDC is trading for $0.912 na enoto. This unpegging has also led to five other stablecoins losing their pegs. Nadalje, on Saturday, Coinbase, Binance, and Crypto.com temporarily suspended USDC trades and conversions.

Oznake v tej zgodbi
Bilanca stanja, Bank Failure, Bank Run, banking tech startups, Bankruptcy, kolaps, contagion, depoziti, Economist, FDIC, Fiat, Galaxy Digital, illogical inverted yield curve, obrestne mere, long-duration treasuries, long-term treasuries, Peter Schiff, policy mistake, Powell, zvišanja tečajev, Shapeshift, short-term Treasuries, Silicon Valley Bank, banka Silvergate, speculators, subprime mortgages, SVB, SVB deposits, ZDA. Zvezna korporacija za zavarovanje depozitov, ZDA. Državne rezerve, unqualified buyers, Tveganega kapitala, Venture Capitalists, Dvigi, Yellen

What do you think about the opinions surrounding the SVB failure? Delite svoje misli v spodnjem oddelku za komentarje.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman je vodja novic pri Bitcoin-Tidings.com News in finančni novinar, ki živi na Floridi. Redman je od takrat aktiven član skupnosti kriptovalut 2011. Ima strast do bitcoinov, odprtokodna koda, in decentralizirane aplikacije. Od septembra 2015, Redman je napisal več kot 6,000 članki za Bitcoin-Tidings.com Novice o motečih protokolih, ki se pojavljajo danes.




Zasluge za slike: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Zavrnitev odgovornosti: Ta članek je zgolj informativne narave. Ne gre za neposredno ponudbo ali nagovarjanje k ponudbi za nakup ali prodajo, ali priporočilo ali odobritev katerega koli izdelka, storitve, ali podjetja. Bitcoin-Tidings.com ne zagotavlja investicije, davek, pravni, ali računovodski nasvet. Niti podjetje niti avtor ne odgovarjata, neposredno ali posredno, za kakršno koli škodo ali izgubo, povzročeno ali domnevno povzročeno z ali v povezavi z uporabo ali zanašanjem na katero koli vsebino, blaga ali storitev, omenjenih v tem članku.

Preberi zavrnitev odgovornosti