Поддержка Ripple растет в иске SEC по поводу XRP — генеральный директор говорит, что «это беспрецедентно»

Поддержка Ripple Labs в борьбе против США. Комиссия по ценным бумагам и биржам (SEC) над XRP вырос, с 12 записки amicus поданы. “It’s unprecedented,” Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said, adding that each brief explains in its own unique way “the irreparable harm the SEC will do to every facet of the U.S. crypto economy if it gets its way.”

Содержание

12 Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of Ripple

A growing number of amicus briefs have been filed in support of Ripple Labs as the company continues to fight the U.S. Комиссия по ценным бумагам и биржам (SEC) lawsuit over the sale of XRP. Twelve amicus briefs have been filed on behalf of Ripple so far, including one by the Nasdaq-listed cryptocurrency exchange Коинбейс, which was among the first trading platforms to delist XRP following the SEC’s lawsuit.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse tweeted Friday:

For those of you keeping count, 12 amici briefs submitted. It’s unprecedented (I’m told) to have this happen at this stage. They each explain — in their own unique way — the irreparable harm the SEC will do to every facet of the U.S. crypto economy if it gets its way.

Besides Coinbase, other individuals, компании, and organizations that have filed amicus briefs on behalf of Ripple are ICAN, I-Remit, Tapjets, Spendthebits, Ассоциация Блокчейн, John E. Deaton, Crypto Council for Innovation, Valhil Capital, Chamber of Digital Commerce, Cryptillian Payment Systems, and Veri Dao LLC.

With the growing number of amicus briefs filed on behalf of Ripple, the SEC asked the court for more time to reply to them. В пятницу, the court granted the agency’s motion to extend the time for all parties to file and reply to amicus briefs. The deadline for filing amicus briefs is now Nov. 11 and replies must be filed by Nov. 30.

Commenting on the SEC seeking more time to reply to all the amicus briefs filed, Stuart Alderoty, general counsel for Ripple, tweeted Thursday:

A dozen independent voices — companies, developers, обмены, public interest and trade associations, retail holders — all filing in SEC v Ripple to explain how dangerously wrong the SEC is. The SEC’s response? We need more time, not to listen or engage, but to blindly bulldoze on.

The securities regulator sued Ripple, its CEO, and co-founder Chris Larsen in December 2020 over the sale of XRP, alleging that the crypto token is a security.

Garlinghouse said last month that he expects an answer in the first half of 2023, noting that Ripple would consider a settlement with the securities watchdog if the regulator states that XRP is not a security. The executive stressed that the XRP case is not just about Ripple but the whole crypto industry.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has said on several occasions that while bitcoin is a commodity, most other crypto tokens are securities. Однако, the SEC has been criticized for taking an правоприменительный подход to regulating the crypto industry. Кроме того, four U.S. lawmakers sent a letter to Gensler this week accusing him of “hypocritical mismanagement” of the SEC and refusing to “practice what he preaches.”

Теги в этой истории
трусы-амикус, Брэд Гарлингхаус, Коинбейс, суд SEC, пульсация, Лаборатории пульсации, SEC, второй иск по поводу XRP, сек xrp, поддержка Рипл, XRP, безопасность xrp

Do you think the SEC or Ripple Labs will win this case? Do you think the SEC will declare that XRP is not a security? Дайте нам знать в комментариях ниже.

Кевин Хелмс

Студент австрийского экономического факультета., Кевин нашел биткойн в 2011 и с тех пор был евангелистом. Его интересы заключаются в безопасности биткойнов, системы с открытым исходным кодом, сетевые эффекты и пересечение экономики и криптографии.




Кредиты изображений: Шаттерсток, Pixabay, Викисклад

Отказ от ответственности: Эта статья предназначена только для информационных целей. Это не прямое предложение или запрос предложения о покупке или продаже, или рекомендацию или одобрение любых продуктов, Сервисы, или компании. Биткойн-Tidings.com не дает инвестиций, налог, законный, или консультации по бухгалтерскому учету. Ни компания, ни автор не несут ответственности, прямо или косвенно, за любой ущерб или убытки, вызванные или предположительно вызванные или связанные с использованием или доверием к любому контенту, товары или услуги, упомянутые в этой статье.

Читать отказ от ответственности