En septembre 8, 2021, Dmitri Berenzon, partenaire de recherche chez 1kxnetwork, un fonds cryptographique de démarrage qui aide les fondateurs à démarrer des réseaux de jetons, a publié un article de recherche complet sur les ponts blockchain. Berenzon’s study highlights the current “multi-chain market structure” and bridges that are making a myriad of blockchains compatible.
Contenu
Researcher: ‘We Are Finally in a Multi-Chain Market Structure’
For quite some time now, multi-chain or cross-chain technology has been a holy grail of sorts in the cryptocurrency development space. People want to transact with other blockchains by leveraging bridges to different ecosystems.
Dmitri Berenzon published a detailed article about the subject of cross-chain tech and bridges, and he believes we’ve finally reached a watershed moment. “After years of research & development, we are finally in a multi-chain market structure,” Berenzon stresses in his blog post.
Berenzon’s study looks at blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, Tezos, avalanche, Pois, Chaîne intelligente Binance, Cosmos, et plus. The researcher notes that “interoperability unlocks innovation” as he highlights that “bridges are important because they enable users to access new platforms, protocols to interoperate with each other, and developers to collaborate on building new products.”
Le co-fondateur d'Axie Infinity déclare que le jeu Blockchain prévoit de lancer un échange décentralisé, Berenzon lists the many benefits of cross-chain interoperability like leveraging the tech for external validators and federations. Aussi, using the tech for light clients and relay protocols alongside the ability to access liquidity networks.
toutefois, Berenzon’s report is not just a fluff piece about fintech, and he highlights that cross-chain tech and bridges are an “incredibly difficult problem in distributed systems.” He adds that things like finality and rollbacks need to be addressed, NFT transfers and provenance, alongside stress testing these blockchain bridges over time.
$7.7 Billion Locked Across 8 Bridges to Ethereum
In addition to Berenzon’s insights, statistics from Dune Analytics’ dashboard called “Bridge Away” measure bridge volume tethered to the various chains and Ethereum. In terms of Ethereum bridge relative total value locked (TVL) stats, the Polygon ERC20 Bridge has approximately $2.4 billion in TVL on September 16, 2021.
Polygon’s bridge represents 32.5% of the TVL across eight bridges. The bridges recorded include the Polygon ERC20 Bridge, Ponts arbitres, Pont d'avalanche, Trou de ver de Solana, Pont Anyswap Fantom, Ponts d'harmonie, Ponts Optimism ERC20, and Near Rainbow Bridge.
Across all of these bridges mentioned, il y a $7.79 billion TVL spread across 42,997 unique addresses during the last 30 jours. Arbitrum Bridges command 31.5% of the aggregate TVL and the Avalanche Bridge has around 21.2% aujourd'hui.
Solana Wormhole’s TVL is about 6.7% and the Fantom Anyswap Bridge has around 6.6% Suggestions de sondages récents $7.79 billion TVL. Ether and WETH are the top assets held in TVL with $2.9 billion recorded on September 16. USDC is the second leading asset held in bridge TVL with $1.2 billion recorded. This is followed by wrapped bitcoin (WBTC) which has just over a billion dollars held in the overall bridge TVL aggregate total.
What do you think about multi-chain or cross-chain bridge technology and the expanding TVL held by these protocols? Faites-nous savoir ce que vous pensez de ce sujet dans la section commentaires ci-dessous.
Crédits image: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Dmitri Berenzon, Various blockchain logos, Analyse des dunes,
Avertissement: Cet article est à titre informatif seulement. Il ne s'agit pas d'une offre directe ou d'une sollicitation d'offre d'achat ou de vente, ou une recommandation ou une approbation de tout produit, prestations de service, ou des entreprises. Bitcoin-Tidings.com ne fournit pas d'investissement, impôt, légal, ou conseil comptable. Ni la société ni l'auteur ne sont responsables, directement ou indirectement, pour tout dommage ou perte causé ou prétendument causé par ou en relation avec l'utilisation ou la confiance accordée à tout contenu, biens ou services mentionnés dans cet article.
Lire avertissement