Signaler: La SEC renforce l'enquête sur les auditeurs qui entretiennent les échanges cryptographiques

According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Paul Munter, the agency’s acting chief accountant, les Etats Unis. regulator is monitoring proof-of-reserves (POR) more closely. “We’re warning investors to be very wary of some of the claims that are being made by crypto companies,” Munter explained to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on Dec. 22.

Contenu

SEC Official Warns Investors Should Be ‘Wary’ of Proof-of-Reserve Audits and Crypto Exchange Claims

NOUS. régulateurs, and more specifically the Securities and Exchange Commission (SECONDE), are looking more closely at proof-of-reserves (POR) these days following the collapse of FTX. Speaking with the WSJ on Thursday, SEC’s acting chief accountant, Paul Munter, explained that investors should not put much faith in POR audits and claims. SEC is concerned that investors “may be getting a false sense of reassurance from the firms’ reports,” the WSJ report detailed.

“We’re warning investors to be very wary of some of the claims that are being made by crypto companies,” Munter explained. “Investors should not place too much confidence in the mere fact a company says it’s got a proof-of-reserves from an audit firm,” the SEC accountant stressed. Munter continued:

[A POR audit] is not enough information for an investor to assess whether the company has sufficient assets to cover its liabilities.

The commentary from Munter follows the POR concept gaining traction among crypto exchanges since FTX collapsed. Companies like Okx, Binance, Crypto.com, Houbi, and others have released POR audits but some were met with controversy. en outre, on Dec. 16, Actualités Bitcoin-Tidings.com signalé on the accounting agency Mazars Group after it revealed it would no longer provide crypto exchange audits. Binance’s POR audit completed by Mazars was also removed from the web.

“We are increasing our understanding of what’s going on in the marketplace,” Munter told the WSJ. “If we find fact patterns that we think are troublesome, we will consider a referral to the division of enforcement.”

En outre, after Mazars Group said it would not offer POR audits to crypto exchanges, a spokesperson for the auditing firm BDO mentionné that week it is contemplating which kinds of customers to take on. University of Texas professor Jeffrey Johanns believes auditing firms are doing the right thing by being reluctant to offer crypto firms auditing services. “The Big Four firms have…rightly decided the risks [of auditing crypto companies] are extremely high,” Johanns told the WSJ.

Tags dans cette histoire
accountancy firms, auditing crypto firms, auditing firms, audits, BDO, Big Four firms, BTC Reserves, chief accountant, échanges cryptographiques, ETH Reserves, Exchange Reserves, Jeffrey Johanns, Mazars Group, PoR, POR audits, SECONDE, SEC inquiry, sec investigation, SEC probe

What do you think about the SEC’s acting chief accountant and his comments about POR audits? Faites-nous savoir ce que vous pensez de ce sujet dans la section commentaires ci-dessous.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman est le responsable de l'information chez Bitcoin-Tidings.com News et un journaliste spécialisé dans les technologies financières vivant en Floride. Redman est un membre actif de la communauté des crypto-monnaies depuis 2011. Il a une passion pour Bitcoin, code open-source, et applications décentralisées. Depuis septembre 2015, Redman a écrit plus de 6,000 articles pour Bitcoin-Tidings.com Actualités sur les protocoles perturbateurs qui émergent aujourd'hui.




Crédits image: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Avertissement: Cet article est à titre informatif seulement. Il ne s'agit pas d'une offre directe ou d'une sollicitation d'offre d'achat ou de vente, ou une recommandation ou une approbation de tout produit, prestations de service, ou des entreprises. Bitcoin-Tidings.com ne fournit pas d'investissement, impôt, légal, ou conseil comptable. Ni la société ni l'auteur ne sont responsables, directement ou indirectement, pour tout dommage ou perte causé ou prétendument causé par ou en relation avec l'utilisation ou la confiance accordée à tout contenu, biens ou services mentionnés dans cet article.

Lire avertissement