Umweltfreundlich, Sozial, und Governance (ESG) Analyst Daniel Batten sagte am Dienstag, dass das rechnerische Rückgrat des Bitcoin-Netzwerks nun genutzt wird 52.6% nachhaltige Energie. Batten und der On-Chain-Analyst Willy Woo haben dynamische Bitcoin-ESG-Charts erstellt, um den Fortschritt des Protokolls zu veranschaulichen.
Inhalt
Contrary to Cambridge University Data, Analyst Says Bitcoin Mining Uses 52.6% Sustainable Energy
Heutzutage, there is significant debate regarding the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining. Im März 7, 2023, ESG-Analyst Daniel Batten tweeted about new ESG charts he helped design with Willy Woo that show Bitcoin’s progress toward using 52.6% nachhaltige Energie. They also highlight total emissions, emissions per dollar, and emissions intensity.
Batten shared a sneak preview of the charts and noted that the data will update dynamically. The analyst also sagte that information about the methodology and the charts will be released soon. ESG analyst Daniel Batten’s Dynamic Bitcoin ESG Charts have been revealed at a time when a number of U.S. Politiker, einschließlich Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, are expressing concerns about bitcoin mining operations.
Senators Ed Markey (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), and Jared Huffman (D-CA) have eingeführt a bill that would mandate “an interagency study on the environmental and energy impacts of crypto asset mining.” However, politicians and media publications have been accused of using questionable methodology and data to evaluate Bitcoin’s environmental impact.
Zum Beispiel, the Digieconomist blog, which is run by Alex de Vries, an employee of the Dutch Central Bank, has been genannt a “conflict of interest” due to his affiliation with the bank. Nevertheless, several environmental activists and politicians cite de Vries’ work. Batten’s preview of the chart is not just a flashy display, as the ESG analyst explained his findings and methodology in a recent redaktionell published on Feb. 19, 2023.
In the article, he discusses the Bitcoin Mining Council Prüfbericht und ein lernen by Cambridge University. Data from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) is regularly cited by politicians and the press when it comes to Bitcoin and environmental concerns. Batten’s findings in the article indicate that 52.6% of energy used for Bitcoin mining is sustainable. The ESG analyst also outlines his methodology on his website and discusses limitations in the CCAF model.
According to Batten’s study, the researcher’s “overall zero-emission energy figure is 7.2% lower than the BMC data,” however, “it is significantly higher than the CCAF report from September 2022.” Furthermore, Batten was able to “almost precisely replicate” the CCAF methodology that resulted in 37% sustainable energy and then factor in the limitations of the CCAF report to obtain the true number.
Batten maintains that his model is more realistic until the CCAF takes into account off-grid and Fackelgasabbau. “Between September 2022 und Juni 2023, we anticipate the Bitcoin network to operate on +4.5% more zero-emission power sources,” the report stated. zusätzlich, the report noted that some critics have claimed that Bitcoin relies on grids that are predominantly powered by coal, but Batten’s and CCAF’s data does not support the coal hypothesis.
Do you believe that the use of sustainable energy sources for bitcoin mining will continue to increase in the coming years? Teilen Sie Ihre Gedanken im Kommentarbereich unten mit.
Bildnachweise: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki-Commons
Haftungsausschluss: Dieser Artikel dient nur zu Informationszwecken. Es ist kein direktes Angebot oder Aufforderung zur Abgabe eines Angebots zum Kauf oder Verkauf, oder eine Empfehlung oder Befürwortung von Produkten, Dienstleistungen, oder Firmen. Bitcoin-Tidings.com bietet keine Investition, MwSt, legal, oder Buchhaltungsberatung. Weder das Unternehmen noch der Autor sind dafür verantwortlich, direkt oder indirekt, für alle Schäden oder Verluste, die durch oder in Verbindung mit der Nutzung oder dem Vertrauen auf Inhalte verursacht oder angeblich verursacht wurden, Waren oder Dienstleistungen, die in diesem Artikel erwähnt werden.
Lesen Haftungsausschluss