Indien beslaglægger aktiver i $162M Morris Coin Cryptocurrency Investment Scheme

Det indiske håndhævelsesdirektorat har beslaglagt aktiver til en værdi af ca $5 millioner i forbindelse med en påstået cryptocurrency-svindel, der involverede Morris-mønter, der har luret investorer ud af $162 million. Udbyttet fra forbrydelsen blev brugt til at købe kryptovalutaer.

India Authorities Seize Assets in Alleged Crypto Scam Case

Indias Enforcement Directorate (ED), a specialized financial investigation agency under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, has seized assets valued at 36.72 crore rupees ($5 million) in connection with a cryptocurrency scam.

The ED began investigating the scheme after a first information report (FIR) was registered by the Kerala Police under the Indian Penal Code. Multiple other FIRs were subsequently registered by police in other districts.

The scheme involves a nonexistent cryptocurrency called Morris coin. Nishad and his companies conducted an initial coin offering (ICO) for the coin and collected money from investors. The ED explained that they heldpromotional events in the presence of celebritiesand usedflashy websitesto attract investors. The police said that over 900 investors were duped out of 1,200 crore rupees.

The money collected from investors was used to purchase immovable properties, cryptocurrencies, and luxury cars, as well as pay for premium hotels and resorts, the ED noted.

The seized assets belong to Nishad K. and his associates. They include money in multiple bank accounts, land, and cryptocurrencies purchased out of the proceeds of crime.

The ED detailed:

Cryptocurrencies such as ETH, BTC, BNB, YFI, VET, DER ER, og USDT, valued at ₹25,82,794, and maintained at Indian and international crypto exchanges, were found. They were purchased out of the proceeds of crime.

During investigation, all the above cryptocurrencieswere converted into Indian rupee and transferred to the bank account by the coinsowner, which were attached,” the ED statement notes.

What do you think about this case? Fortæl os det i kommentarfeltet nedenfor.