'Fiat er skrøbelig' - Silicon Valley Banks kollaps giver fingerpeg og bekymringer for smitte

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) er blevet centrum for opmærksomheden, efter dets sammenbrud fik U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) at lukke banken fredag. Det var den største U.S. bankkonkurs siden 2008, and various alleged catalysts have been pointed to. Some believe venture capitalists caused a bank run, while others blame the U.S. Federal Reserve’s rate hikes. Economist and gold bug Peter Schiff said on Friday that the U.S. banking system would experience more trouble ahead. He and several speculators believe that these financial institutions hold mountains of long-term treasuries.

Indhold

Calls for SVB Intervention as Market Observers Predict Larger Financial Collapse in the U.S.

Over the past week, two U.S. banking institutions, Silvergate Bank og Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) failed. SVB’s bryder sammen was the largest banking failure since Washington Mutual (Wamu) i 2008, which was blamed on expanding branches too quickly and holding massive amounts of subprime mortgages lent to so-called unqualified buyers.

Before its collapse, Wamu held $188.3 billion in deposits, while SVB is estimated to have lost around $175.4 billion in deposits. Imidlertid, while SVB’s deposits at the end of December 2022 were $175.4 milliard, customers attempted to remove $42 milliard on Thursday alone. It’s safe to say that SVB’s demise was a lot faster than Wamu’s collapse at the end of 2008.

‘Fiat Is Fragile’ — Silicon Valley Bank's Collapse Sparks Finger-Pointing and Concerns of Contagion

Just days before its collapse, SVB attempted to strengthen its balance sheet by announcing the need to raise $2.25 milliard. The bank also sold its available-for-sale (AFS) bond portfolio for $21 milliard, resulting in a $1.8 billion loss from the sale. SVB is well-known for banking tech startups and venture capital (VC) penge, and some market observers believe that these clients caused a bank run.

“This was a hysteria-induced bank run caused by VCs,” sagde Ryan Falvey, a fintech investor at Restive Ventures, in an interview with CNBC on Friday. “This is going to be remembered as one of the ultimate cases of an industry cutting off its nose to spite its face," han tilføjede.

‘Fiat Is Fragile’ — Silicon Valley Bank's Collapse Sparks Finger-Pointing and Concerns of Contagion

Other analysts and market observers are blaming the illogical inverted yield curve that long and short-term Treasuries are facing today, as well as the U.S. Federal Reserve rentestigninger. Soona Amhaz, founder and managing partner at Volt Capital, sagde: “The open secret is that technically most U.S. banks are bankrupt right now, as they’re all sitting on long-duration treasuries that are underwater in a 4% interest rate environment.”

Economist and gold bug Peter Schiff shares a similar view to Amhaz, expecting a much larger financial collapse in the United States. "USA. banking system is on the verge of a much bigger collapse than 2008. Banks own long-term paper at extremely low-interest rates,” Schiff anført. He continued:

They can’t compete with short-term Treasuries. Mass withdrawals from depositors seeking higher yields will result in a wave of bank failures.

Craft Ventures executive David Sacks took to Twitter, calling on Powell to intervene and prevent a possible contagion. “Where is Powell? Where is Yellen? Stop this crisis NOW,” Sacks tweeted. “Announce that all depositors will be safe. Place SVB with a Top 4 bank. Do this before Monday’s opening, or there will be contagion and the crisis will spread.”

‘Fiat Is Fragile’ — Silicon Valley Bank's Collapse Sparks Finger-Pointing and Concerns of Contagion

Billionaire and Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz also weighed in, expressing surprise that the Fed would let depositors lose money in Silicon Valley Bank. “Are all banks going to be treated like hedge funds? Seems like a policy mistake,” Novogratz anført. Shapeshift founder Erik Voorhees ridiculed the call for Fed intervention on Twitter, angiver, “Fiat is fragile.”

SVB’s issues have impacted the crypto economy, particularly the stablecoin economy backed by fiat reserves. Cirkel disclosed that it had $3.3 billion of cash supporting usd coin (USDC) trapped in the bank, causing USDC to unpeg from the U.S. dollar parity. As of 10:30 er. marts 11, 2023, USDC is trading for $0.912 pr. enhed. This unpegging has also led to five other stablecoins losing their pegs. desuden, på lørdag, Møntbase, Binance, and Crypto.com temporarily suspended USDC trades and conversions.

Tags i denne historie
Balance, Banksvigt, Bank Run, bankteknologiske startups, Konkurs, bryder sammen, smitte, indskud, Økonom, FDIC, Fiat, Galaxy Digital, ulogisk omvendt rentekurve, renter, langsigtede statskasser, langsigtede statskasser, peter skib, politik fejl, Powell, rentestigninger, Formskifte, kortfristede statsobligationer, Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate Bank, spekulanter, subprime realkreditlån, SVB, SVB indskud, OS. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, OS. Federal Reserve, ukvalificerede købere, Venturekapital, Venturekapitalister, Udbetalinger, Yellen

What do you think about the opinions surrounding the SVB failure? Del dine tanker i kommentarfeltet nedenfor.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman er nyhedschef hos Bitcoin-Tidings.com News og en finansteknologisk journalist, der bor i Florida. Redman har været et aktivt medlem af cryptocurrency-fællesskabet siden 2011. Han har en passion for Bitcoin, åben kildekode, og decentrale applikationer. Siden september 2015, Redman har skrevet mere end 6,000 artikler til Bitcoin-Tidings.com Nyheder om de forstyrrende protokoller, der dukker op i dag.




Billedkreditter: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Ansvarsfraskrivelse: Denne artikel er kun til informationsformål. Det er ikke et direkte tilbud eller opfordring til et tilbud om at købe eller sælge, eller en anbefaling eller godkendelse af produkter, tjenester, eller virksomheder. Bitcoin-Tidings.com giver ikke investeringer, skat, gyldige, eller regnskabsrådgivning. Hverken virksomheden eller forfatteren er ansvarlig, direkte eller indirekte, for enhver skade eller tab forårsaget eller påstået at være forårsaget af eller i forbindelse med brugen af ​​eller tilliden til noget indhold, varer eller tjenesteydelser nævnt i denne artikel.

Læs ansvarsfraskrivelse